I've seen a number of articles lately on the role of the financial advisor. I've also been asked lately where do I think the markets are headed. Both thoughts dovetail nicely I think.
The financial advisor's role is to help protect and build your asset base. You have worked hard over the years to build up a 401k balance, own a nice home and build, hopefully, a taxable investment portfolio as well. You have also tried to save money for college, for retirement and for future generations. You want to retire earlier than your parents did and enjoy the "fruits of your labor". This is where the advisor comes in.
Most of us do not have the ability to forecast the future with precision. Thus, our objective is to forecast as best as possible and hedge the potential risks we expect to encounter along the way. We will attempt to protect your assets via financial and estate planning techniques so that you keep as much as possible of what you have earned and have the best opportunities to pass on a legacy to future generations of your family. A number of risks are encountered in this process - legal and regulatory changes, economic cycles, etc. Not all can be forecast with certainty and the advisor should account for that uncertainty.
With regard to investments, I believe advisors should be focused on constructing portfolios that attempt to meet basic goals - generate an absolute return that exceeds inflation plus a spending percentage and hedge against potential downside risks. These are competing goals and thus require constant examination. Asset allocation is not dead but does need to be revisited conceptually. I believe that rather than regarding asset allocation as an equity/fixed/other combination, advisors should be viewing asset allocation as core-satellite or on a risk basis. The allocation decision is driven by risk targets first, then by return. So the objective is to properly allocate risk among various assets. In this assessment, lower risk strategies are considered core strategies and can be fixed income, equity or other assets. Same goes for riskier assets (satellite). This does involve a degree of tactical asset allocation which involves trading more the riskier assets more frequently. I'm not trying to time the perfect entry and exit, rather, I'm trying to take advantage of volatility to provide excess return when assets are moving up and hedge downside risk when assets are declining. It's not perfect but I think better addresses my primary objectives than the traditional asset allocation approach.
So the financial advisor is attempting to preserve and grow what you've acquired. We should be more conservative than you most of the time and should be the "voice inside your head" attempting to reason you out of more aggressive decisions. We're not perfect, but if we successful one more time than we're not, we should do well for you.
As to where the markets are going, I don't know. I'm always skeptical (never truly a bull or a bear) and always more comfortable with a portfolio that has some "insurance" against a market decline. I think the "premium" paid to hedge some of the downside volatility is worthwhile.